It was interesting to read the class reviews on the four artists that we were assigned. There was diversity in the reactions of my classmates, however the general tone is reflected here in my analysis.
Based on group reviews Gregory Crewdson was seen as the most difficult to decipher because of his vacant and desolate images filled with questions and very little answers. He piqued our interest with his use of rich tones and use of light which created a cinematic feel. Many saw his work as highly detailed and meticulous which gave him respect and held our interest. One student observed the use of perspective and visual depth which funneled into a shrinking portal in which she further observed Crewdson's melancholy subjects.This observation was incredibly insightful.
Classmate's reaction to Jeff Wall's images were the most varied.They ranged in descriptions from most compelling and successful dynamic composition to dark, boring, lacking subject matter which vanishing points and interest in his creation of false realities.
Cindy Sherman was generally appreciated on the commentary she provided in her lost but not found persona. Most agreed on her varying perspectives of fictional women in stereotypical scenarios was a statement on iconic women in society. A good number compared her as an actor acting out a variety of her scenarios for her film stills. However, one review felt she was boring and uninteresting.
The class favorite were images of Tuen Hocks. His whimsical style with a surrealist quality left many of us with the desire to engage with these unique photographs that have been manipulated and painted over in a unusual technique. Most of the subject matter was lighthearted, creating a captivating composition where reality is transformed and absurdity and fantasy are embraced.